翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Liberal conservatism
・ Liberal Conspiracy
・ Liberal Constitutional Party (Egypt)
・ Liberal Corporate Association of Salzburg
・ Liberal corporatism
・ Liberal Country Party
・ Liberal democracy
・ Liberal Democracy (France)
・ Liberal Democracy of Slovenia
・ Libellulosoma
・ Libellulosoma minuta
・ Libellus
・ Libellus constructionis Farfensis
・ Libellus De Arte Coquinaria
・ Libellus de exordio
Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma
・ Libellus de Medicinalibus Indorum Herbis
・ Libellus de Nativitate Sanctae Mariae
・ Libellus responsionum
・ Liben
・ Liben Zone
・ Liben, Oromia
・ Liben, Oromia, East Shewa
・ Libenge
・ Libenge Airport
・ Libenice
・ Liber
・ Liber (disambiguation)
・ Liber Abaci
・ Liber ad honorem Augusti


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma : ウィキペディア英語版
Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma

''Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma'' is an anonymous Latin treatise on "imperial power in the city of Rome". It has been dated as early as the late 9th century and as late as ''c''. 950, and was probably written at Spoleto.〔Karl Josef Heidecker, ''The Divorce of Lothar II: Christian Marriage and Political Power in the Carolingian World'' (Cornell University Press, 2010), 41 n.18.〕 It survives in one mansucript, appended to the contemporary ''Chronicon'' by Benedict of Sant'Andrea.〔Benedict's ''Chronicon'' stresses the dominance of Dukes Alberic I and Alberic II of Spoleto during the papacy of John X and John XI, even incorrectly labelling the dukes imperial viceroys, cf. John Howe, ''Church Reform and Social Change in Eleventh-Century Italy: Dominic of Sora and His Patrons'' (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997), 25 n.4.〕
The ''Libellus'' argues for the authority of the Holy Roman Emperor in the so-called "patrimony of Saint Peter".〔Johannes Fried, ''Donation of Constantine and ''Constitutum Constantini'': The Misinterpretation of a Fiction and its Original Meaning'' (Walter de Gruyter, 2007), 46. For the constitutional basis of this authority, cf. ''Pactum Hludowicianum''.〕 Ferdinand Gregorovius calls its author an "Imperialist" and a "partisan", and doubts the accuracy of his claim that "(emperor's ) legate resides in Rome at all times".〔''Inventum est, ut omnes majores Romae essent imperialies homines, et ut suus missus omni tempore moraretur Romae'' ("It is found that all the great men of Rome are imperial men, and therefore his (emperor's ) legate all the time resides in Rome"), quoted in Gregorovius, ''The History of the City of Rome in the Middle Ages'' (Rome: 1905), V, 8.〕 According to Eleanor Duckett, the author of the ''Libellus'' "poured out his feelings into that interesting document".〔Duckett, ''Death and Life in the Tenth Century'' (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968), 138.〕 The author clearly sides with the Emperor Louis II against Pope Nicholas I.〔
==Editions==

*Giuseppe Zucchetti, ed. ''Il Chronicon di Benedetto, monaco di S. Andrea del Soratte e il "Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma"'', Fonti per la storia d'Italia, 55. Rome: 1920.
*Georg Pertz, ed. "De imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma libellus", ''Mon. Germ. Hist.'' Scriptores, iii, 719–22.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Libellus de imperatoria potestate in urbe Roma」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.